MSM Main Scream Mania BBC NYT ASPI attack China Best China Info Barrie VVeiss and other pro China Voices

So the BBC British Bullshit Corp(se) and Australian Strategic Policy Institute ASPI (ASswiPe) personally attacked and tried to slander Barrie VVeiss, at least twice each, (that I’m aware of..)
Now the New York Times and Washington Post try a shot.. Fox News Dutch National TV NPO CNN AgentSmith-ChrisFGChappel-China-uncensored and numerous other also rans try to grab a piece of the action too..
One can only assume that WE – Barrie VVeiss – Best China Info, and other pro-China vloggers, writers, voices are having an effect, getting to them, making a difference, hitting the mark.

Barrie Exposes Twitter’s collaboration with the US Weapons Corporation Funded ASPI

There was me thinking I was OO7 (+ a half) now they tell me I’m head of the worldwide network of spidery things with tentacles.. SPECTRE #ASPI: Bunch of fcuking #Clowns paid fortunes to produce piles of #Bollocks.. via @Baz

BBC to Barrie: “Your videos are part of CPC disinfo campaign to blah..” Barrie to BBC – regarding these claims: “Neither you @sophierose233 nor Kerry Whateverthefcukshername, BBC, ASPI or New York Times has a shred of evidence of this BS! Truth is, If they offered me money I’d take it!

— Barrie VVeiss

The BBC Attack Part 1:
Part 2: ..
Email exchanges: bestchinainfo.barrie-v-bbc-full-transcript/
Part 3:
My Answer to the ASPI (Second!) Attack:

So, onward.. The Latest Smear-Job from ASPI:
Latest New York Times – NYT – Hit-Piece: nytimes.china-influencers
One can only assume that Barrie VVeiss – Best China Info, and other pro-China vloggers, writers, voices are having an effect, getting to them, making a difference, hitting the mark.
We’ve Got Them On The Run. They’re worried. Peeing their Panties.
Latest Hit-Pieces:

Barrie – Head of the WorldWide Network of Spidery things with tentacles
– and there was me thinking I was like 007 and a half – and now they’re telling me I’m head of SPECTRE!

– The massive barrage of attacks on China Friendly YouTubers, writers, thinkers and academics shows that the MSM – The MainStream Mania are piddling in their panties because we’ve got their paymasters at the MIC worried. Seriously.
– The Fear is Showing – The Constant Stream of assdribble from the MSM The Main Stream Mania is proof Enough – The BBC Attacked, The ASPI Attacked.. Now the New York Times and Washington Post try a shot.. and Fox News are trying to grab a piece of the action too..

JiCYMi: The New York Times are the lying MIC / CIA / ‘Agent Smith’ infested shysters who trotted out all the lies on Chinese Tennis Star – Peng Shuai – Which ALL the MIC’s Pavlovian Parrots regurgitated – right on cue.

See Barrie’s Analysis Here:

I took my lead from the Excellent Fact Demolition of New York Times Lies by Moon of Alabama: Moon of Alabama followed up with:

Yes I did say the Lies about China’s Xinjiang province and Uyghurs, genocide, Slave/Forced/Coerced labour have been debunked many times: Here’s just a few: china-xinjiang-uyghurs
Where did the lies start? Part 1 of 4. Millions of #Uyghurs in camps #Xinjiang? Where did the lies and propaganda about China’s Xinjiang Uyghurs Actually Start? Part 1 of 4. A Self-Certifying Self-Perpetuating closed-unit Loop of Scripted Disinformation, Spin and Lies from CIA – NED Radio Free Asia Adrian Zenz CHRD Part 1: Part 2:
Part 3:

— Barrie VVeiss

Updates Here:


oh hilarious.. another flimsy BBC copycat article – previously attempted by the ASPI – soundly debunked here:
See the Prequel:
and yes the riposte is ready..

See also ASPI (first) attack on Barrie:
Second attack:
Re: ASPI – Further reading: and and and

— @ChinaBeehive

Barrie – BestChinaInfo – I’m one of the ‘vloggers’ , the first, mentioned in the utterly disingenuous and misleading BBC Hit-piece. The BBC’s Kerry Allen and Sophie Williams told deliberate untruths – nay, lies that the aforementioned vloggers ‘spread CPC disinformation’: – Of course we do not! Here’s my take on the whole sorry BBC debacle: It started with a previous feeble attempt by the MIC / MIPAC’s mouthpiece the ASPI (Australian strategic Policy Institute – a ‘Think:’Tank’.) which I ridiculed here: – the BBC hit-piece is a copycat of this flimsy rubbish – Here’s the ‘Prequel’ to the BBC’s latest bungled attempt to besmirch China and independent pro-China voices: / Here’s another excellent takedown – BBC comedy hit-piece dissected: The New Atlas– Highly recommended.
Here are my actual responses to the questions and ‘claims’ the BBC put to me:
(Videos embedded at bottom of page)

— Barrie VVeiss


New video in process.. Although I made a ‘prequel’ to the BBC’s hit-piece’ on China (and pro China vloggers) and also published the complete transcript of my email exchange with the BBC, and my responses to it, I never actually gave an appraisal of the article itself. Having revisited it, I realised it’s worth examining this again. Coming soon!
Prequel: /
Barrie’s complete response and analysis:
Full transcript of the email exchanges:

More detail on the BBC revenge attack hit-piece and Barrie’s resposese and analysis at foot of this page.

— Barrie VVeiss

They only try to tackle the ones with the ball(s) so to speak.

The BBC tried this before, the ASPI also tried – in fact they both tried, at least twice – See:
Further on this – Western MSM Set Up Hit Pieces – BBC – Australian Strategic Policy Institute – ASPI – attacked Barrie VVeiss at least twice – in 2019 2020 in 2021 and now the New York Times are lining up for their pissy little shot..…

See also – Jerry Grey – Another superb article Jerry – I’ve experienced these MSM ‘setups’ on more than a few occasions – The BBC tried this.. the ASPI also tried – in fact they both tried, at least twice – See:

Further on this – Western MSM Set Up Hit Pieces – BBC – Australian Strategic Policy Institute – ASPI – attacked Barrie VVeiss at least twice – in 2019 2020 in 2021 and now the New York Times are lining up for their piddly little shot..…


BBC Email exchanges and Barrie’s Video Excerpt Transcript: 20:13 You know so next question: “Your videos 20:17 are part of a disinformation campaign 20:20 to spread communist party rhetoric” 20:23 Barrie me to the BBC again no 20:27 see above the rest of the email 20:30 another insinuation by you yourselves 20:34 another ethereal claim floating in from 20:37 this 20:38 strange entity that is making these 20:41claims another ethereal 20:44 ridiculous claim that you you don’t want 20:46 to say where it comes from but i know 20:47 where it comes from and everybody out 20:49 here 20:50 knows where it comes from okay so to 20:53 continue 20:55 uh this is laughable this is baseless 20:57 okay 20:59 i will state clearly 21:03 categorically to these supposed claims 21:06 neither you nor the BBC 21:10 nor the ASPI nor anyone else21:13on this planet has one single21:16shred one iota of 21:20 evidence to prove otherwise this21:23is another insinuation another ethereal21:27claim21:27from this disembodied 21:31 entity okay so 21:35 part of a disinformation campaign no 21:38 come on.. 21:40

22:05 right next question next claim 22:10 you are paid by china to create these 22:14 videos 22:15 – I f*cking wish! somebody would give me 22:17 some f*cking money to do what I do 22:19 really seriously no I’m not okay 22:22 so my answer excuse me 22:25 my answer no I am not 22:29 okay neither China nor the CPC 22:32 nor the Chinese government nor the PRC 22:35 nobody f*cking 22:36 pays me to do what I do right 22:40 the truth is if they offered me money I 22:42 would f*cking take it 22:44 okay if they gave me money I would have 22:47 it gladly because I’m doing this anyway 22:49 so I might as well be paid so again 22:53 not you not the ASPI not Raytheon 22:57 nor Northrop Grumman nor 23:00 BAE nor Lockheed Martin 23:03 not the Uk government nor the US 23:05 government have one single shred of 23:07 proof to prove 23:08 that I am paid by anybody to do what i 23:10 do 23:11 okay show me show me the proof 23:16 right I sign off there 23:19 saying you got no proof and you never23:21will have and and that’s it so I’ve 23:23 answered every claim I’ve answered every 23:25 question

– From:




[Music] [Applause] [Music]
okay [Music]
best china info Barrie VVEiss vv e i s s and

uh i’ve been asked if i would uh offer
my perspective
on on democracy
specifically i think at this point it’s
kind of significant
because china is uh
carrying out uh elections an election
process and now this might come as
something of a shock
to to a lot of people that uh china has
elections china can vote chinese people
can vote
yes actually
they can and they do
so so um hopefully along the way i will
be able to dispel
some myths about
the chinese system of
socialism with chinese characteristics a
social democracy with chinese
characteristics and also i hope to be
able to um
destroy the mythology
as i see it of
what western and so-called developed
countries describe as their
of democracy itself so um i’m going to
be comparing these two things and this
is my perspective this is my considered
opinion okay this is after
a lot of years of living around the
world in the uk in the us
in australia and now in china and i’ve
many sides of the coin okay
so there are elections in progress
people are voting for deputies to the
people’s congress in china across china
in cities and townships
and villages and principalities
there are these this
process of voting is happening
these people get elected and they get
elected on the basis of
meritocracy now i won’t go into the
great details of this because
it can be a little boring and if i over
intellectualize i’ll lose the message of
what i want to say um eric lee um
very well known uh
socialist capitalist i’m going to call
him he did a great speech a great ted
talk on this uh
2013 maybe
for which he received a standing ovation
and he explains this system far better
than i could and he explains it very
succinctly and and very
um entertainingly um and with a lot of
now logic there’s the word uh logic
the system in china works on logic
it works on meritocracy people get
elected on the basis of
can you do the job are you qualified do
you have experience and they have to
prove themselves they’re elected on this
basis it’s a meritocracy it’s a
democracy democratic meritocracy okay a
socialist democratic meritocracy people
have to prove themselves
our president xi jinping himself
it took him more than 30 years to get to
the position that he’s in he’s not just
elected because
uh because he’s popular although he is
extremely popular people don’t get
elected that way in china they get
elected on can you do the job can you do
the job you’re paid to do which is to
serve the people and this is the very
basis of the government government for
the people by the people and can you do
the job
uh so people are elected on this and and
their their work and their achievements
and their progress is monitored and
reviewed and they can progress through
different tiers of government to to
higher levels and but it’s based on on
it takes many years to do this they
don’t just get there overnight they’re
not voted in
by way of contrast let’s look at at
my perspective on on the western
version of
democracy now
is it for the people and by the people
well the people have the illusion of
choice okay there’s an illusion of
choice uh we can choose this guy or this
guy or maybe some of those guys over
here but but we have a choice so it’s
so i’m going to explain why why this is
not true
people are voted into seats of power on
the basis of personality
on the basis of how much money
has been pushed and pumped into the msm
the mainstream media to present them as
the choice that people should make
um now
this has got nothing to do with can this
guy do the job is he capable
can i trust him to run my country it’s
not based on this it’s based on it’s
like a popularity contest and here’s
another word contest
it’s zero sum it’s win or lose and it’s
divisive the whole process is
there is a divisive divide and conquer
process built into this it’s combative
it’s um
it’s about conquest it’s about winning
or losing it’s him or me it’s win or die
this is the inbuilt system this is this
is innate in the western systems of
so-called democracy
it’s them or us
so there’s no agreement in this the
whole thing is combative right from the
people vote for this guy or this guy
on the basis of what the media is
pumping out pumping into their brains
it’s based on this it’s not based on
can this guy do the job does he have a
trap does he or she have a track record
in being capable of doing this
do i trust him to do this
the whole process is
i’m talking about the western process
now western i mean the uk the us
the us and the uk are deeply deeply
divided right now and they have been for
many many years but more so than ever
before australia is also divided
but this is the game and this is the the
idea the idea is to divide people
because a people divided in in
with the western hegemonic terms
are easy to control they’re easy because
they’re fighting amongst themselves
there’s no unity in this and the system
is built on this it’s built on division
it’s built on a conquest it’s built on
zero sun win or lose him or me i saw
and so you have whole nations arguing
about how to run the country well china
doesn’t do it like that china says well
how should we do this and they consult
and things are reviewed and and there
are five-year plans these five-year
plans are measurable
a nation of 1.4 billion people
through a government
for the people and by the people has
eradicated extreme poverty has any
western democratic system achieve this
no have they achieved anything close to
this no have they even promised this no
excuse me have they even promised this
now here’s another thing this word
in the west in the uk in america they
make these promises i’m gonna do this
make this great again rebuild this build
this back better blah blah blah it’s
and these four year cycles it’s a four
year cycle and it’s a four year cycle of
promises that are not kept and you can
go through the western systems and
history and recent history and find out
that people are really unhappy because
these promises aren’t kept they’re made
and they make these promises in order to
get elected and the other side of this
coin the combative side is they throw as
much rubbish as much mud at the opponent
as possible to make the opponent look
so the whole system is based on on an
argument on on fighting it’s not based
on how can we make our country better
for the people do you see what i’m
saying here it’s quite simple to do this
mathematics to do the math on this and
weigh the one thing up against the other
china is accused of being uh
authoritarian uh or um
or uh what’s another word that they like
to use um
a dictatorship well
this is a joke and it’s quite funny to
me um because if you consider that well
if you’re saying that the people of
are dictating to themselves
bang on correct that’s right china is a
dictatorship and it is the people who
are dictating this whole thing
do you see
i’m going to pause because i’m just
making myself laugh here hang on
four year cycle of most western
electoral systems democracies as they
like to call themselves
it’s a four-year cycle which then
gets appended
there’s a four-year cycle people get
voted they’re pushed by the msm who are
funded and given money there’s lobby
so the the
the politicians
who get elected come pre-owned you don’t
think like a car you don’t you buy a
second-hand car
it’s pre-owned it’s already owned being
owned by somebody but these politicians
are still owned by the money because
they’re bought they’re bought to take a
certain attack on things as they’re
bought to
make certain things happen for
corporations the money owns the
government okay i’ll be clear about this
is my perspective but
i can’t see any of the truth in it than
were the people of the uk and the u.s uh
europe various countries consulted uh
australia consulted about uh the inve
the illegal invasion of iraq
or the illegal destruction of libya no
they weren’t they weren’t consulted at
all this was
capitalist adventurism and it was stated
as a plan the pnac for america this was
stated and written down and signed by
various people it’s not difficult to
find this document
we’re going to take out seven countries
in five years iraq was one libya another
syria another were the people consulted
was this anything to do with people no
it wasn’t
okay i mean there’s no consultation in
this at all
um it’s not about the people you see
so and then every four years it gets
upended and then another bunch of clowns
come in
uh to
rake as much money as they can off the
back of the common people
with the promise that we’ll promise this
will promise that we’ll promise the
other whatever we have to promise to get
elected i’m going to tell you a little
just to round this up okay
a long time ago many years ago one of my
elder brothers told me this about
western politics and he said barry look
it’s like this there is only
one game in town
and that is to win
that’s it there’s nothing else there’s
nothing else matters what you say in
order to win doesn’t matter what you
promise in order to win doesn’t matter
the game is to win
and what you do after you’ve won doesn’t
matter either because you can do
anything you like and they do
they invade countries they they pour
billions of the country’s resources into
weapons and arms and manufacturing
uh manufacturing arms and buying weapons
and selling weapons and invading other
uh capitalist adventurism imperialism if
you want to call it that
uh rob the way of the robber baron
scumbag that’s what the system is
so winning is the only game in town the
question of
how should we run this country doesn’t
enter into this equation at all you see
it never has it never has and uh to this
day it does not
the democratic socialist meritocracy
that exists in china is built on
running the country governing the
country properly there are sets of rules
there are these things are implemented
there are five year plans it is carried
i’m not saying it’s perfect when there
are mistakes made there are reviews and
things get reviewed and things get
changed and so as eric lee said
the government might not change as such
it’s still the party
but the policies change to suit the
situation to suit the circumstances the
policies change the policies evolve it’s
a constant revolution you see
and it’s geared up for the people and it
is the people’s voice and now more than
ever with whole system
uh democracy in china you have this
situation where people ordinary people
like you and me are involved and can be
involved at every stage of the process
even to the legislature when when laws
are being drafted
people are invited to comment to suggest
to give their views and these are taken
into account and this can be proven
things have been altered and changed on
the basis of what one person just one
person have said or several people or
many people they have a voice there is a
and this is a government
for the people by the people and it’s
the past 40 years the past 100 years you
can check out the proof of what’s
happened come to china and have a look
come and have a look at chinese cities
and then go back and have a look at your
we have peace we have stability we have
uh the way the government handled the
pandemic situation
it’s faultless and the people trust the
government and this is the other thing
the the approval rating for the chinese
government is sky high it couldn’t get
much higher there’s a reason for this
people trust the government because it
works because it’s the people you see so
is china a dictatorship
if you say that the people are dictating
to themselves yeah china’s a
dictatorship and it works okay
i hope that explains that’s my
perspective is my considered view after
many years of living all around the
i hope that it’s useful to you you know
no one’s telling me what to say here i’m
not i’m not reading some document this
is just coming up off the top of my head
okay anyway thank you for listening and
i hope this gets out to as many people
as possible um and i wish you all
to be in a safe
peaceful and prosperous land
like we are in china
this is possible there are many forms of
democracy you know there are many ways
of looking at it
what exists in the west
you can you can call it democracy if you
want but it’s not
honestly really
i’m giving you the math you do the sums
thank you
there was a girl
that i love
i still do
we used to smile at each other
there was a girl
darkness all around
it all seemed to make sense
we do it all over again
over again

UPDATE: Full Answers / Responses to the BBC’s questions and ‘Claims’ as asked, for what now very much appears to be a pre-written ‘Hit-Piece’ article attempting to smear Barrie V and other pro-China Vloggers,

Not to mention an attempt to smear China and discredit China Ministry of Foreign affairs here: My answers:

Recommended viewing, Brian Berletic also shreds the BBC article:

UPDATE: Here’s the actual transcript – what was actually said – by whom, to whom, and when – word for word (including the BBC lies) Clearly I was not ‘evasive’, neither did I ‘decline to give information’. It was the BBC who refused to go face to face.

UPDATE: Breaking: BBC British Bullshit Corp(se) – Big Bad China – Latest hit-piece attacking Barrie (and other pro – China Vloggers) — Stay tuned…

Breaking News: #BBC British Bullshit Corp(se) – Big Bad China – Latest hit-piece attacking Barrie and other pro-China Vloggers – :

h t t p s : / / w w w . b b c . c o m / n e w s / w o r l d – a s i a – c h i n a – 57780023 音量大版本 – BBC asked me to ‘answer questions’ + ‘claims’ but refused to face me online – hit-piece coming. – BBC 的复仇?(音量大版本)Following Hua Chunying’s now legendary public destruction and total humiliation of the BBC it is to be expected that the BBC would seek revenge.

See: and

There IS a BBC revenge hit-piece coming. The BBC emailed me and asked me if I would like to participate’ refused to meet me face to face online.

Trust the BBC? No I don’t trust them any further than I could kick them, which isn’t very far. I invited the typis.. stenographe.. ‘journali..’ (..?) in question to a face to face online interview – – they refused. I know full well that a hatchet job hit-piece is being written – the agenda is already set and decided – In our email exchanges this reporter has already lied to me – and denied it – twice.

UPDATE!!!: Previous comments cut and pasted into this fourth attempt!! UPDATE: This is a Re-upload – It seems playback is affected on certain devices due to some kind of ‘auto’ optimisation and normalisation algorithm in the software we use to edit videos – discrepancies – probably because there are two video sources involved – it does sound ok on our laptops and phones – maybe it’s just certain devices – we’ll try to -re-optimise the audio track separately tomorrow and re-upload.! Apologies .

Try these re-uploads: and

Anyway, onward, a teaser.

Here’s the initial email exchanges:

Apr 17, 8:24 AM Contact NAME ****** ******** EMAIL ******.********

SUBJECT BBC press contact


HI Barrie, We’re currently writing a story on China and youtubers in the country. Would we be able to speak to you about this? Many thanks Form Submission Apr 18, 1:48 PM Hi ******, Thanks for your email. A story on China and Youtubers in the country.. Well, I might be interested, and although I wouldn’t describe myself as a ‘youtuber’ exactly, some dialogue with you on this would be useful in the first instance, to give me a clearer picture – so I would suggest we have a Tencent meeting / Skype chat to discuss. cheers Barrie Email Apr 21, 6:34 AM Hi Barrie, Thanks so much for getting back to me. As I mentioned, we’re writing a piece on foreigners who create videos for Youtube and appear in Chinese state media. I understand your video was used in a MOFA briefing recently. I had a few questions to ask and also wanted to share some claims that have been made, that I would like to give you a right of reply to. You claim to have worked for a newspaper in England for six years. Where and when was this? Why do you think the Ministry of Foreign Affairs used your video in the briefing? What has prompted you to make these videos? And is there a reason they have become more political over time? Here are the claims that I would like to give you a right of reply to: Your videos are coordinated to counter investigative reports by independent media outlets on topics such as the treatment of China’s Uyghur community Your videos are part of a disinformation campaign to spread communist party rhetoric You are paid by China to create these videos Email…

Best China Info
1 month ago (edited)Part 3 on the BBC Hit-piece here – delving deeper: Inception? Does Mainstream Media such as the BBC Influence Your Thoughts Without You Even Realising it? You might not think they do. But they do. Barrie begins his Analysis of the BBC Hit-Piece and Finds Unexpected Revelations – Mind Control and Thought Manipulation. The BBC never showed or published my responses to the questions and ‘claims’ they put to me, that they asked of me. So. This was a pre-written hit-piece – a thinly veiled attempt to discredit China, Hua ChunYing and China’s MoFA – Ministry of Foreign Affairs – disguised as a smear piece on myself + other pro-China Vloggers.

The BBC, ‘by their good grace’.. ‘gave me the right to reply’ to questions and claims they had concocted – which I did – in full – they never published my replies – but then, that was never the intention – this was a revenge hit-piece to discredit pro China vloggers, and more importantly, to propagandise against China and China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs – Stay tuned for the forthcoming video – there are more revelations coming!!

Part 1: Part 2: ..

Here’s the full transcript of the email exchanges:

Recommend listening to this:

There seems to be an almost rabid desperation to know which newspaper I worked for. I am somewhat bemused by this. It’s no biggie to me. Moreover – my personal and business information is private and will remain so. It’s not for public consumption. I have no reason to lie about my professional history. (At my age one ceases to worry or care too much what people think, what accusations they make, what names they call you, etc)

To re-iterate: “I worked for the UK’s largest circulation daily newspaper for six years”. I know it. My colleagues know it.
(I also worked for the BBC!)

p.s. I read ALL comments – and approve or delete. I am happy to allow criticism through if it is considered, thoughtful, and warrants response. If they don’t, or if there are offensive, menacing, racist or threatening comments (there are many) – they go straight to the trash. It takes time. I’m a pretty busy fellow – I do it whenever I get a minute!

BBC 的复仇?(请将音量调到最大享用)
Part 2 – BARRIE’S ANSWERS. Full summary. Following Hua Chunying‘s now legendary public destruction and total humiliation of the BBC it was to be expected that the BBC would seek revenge.
See: and
Following Hua Chunying’s now legendary public destruction and total humiliation of the BBC it is to be expected that the BBC would seek revenge.
See: and…

The BBC emailed me and asked me if I would like to participate’ refused to meet me face to face online. Trust the BBC? No I don’t trust them any further than I could kick them, which isn’t very far.
I invited the typis.. stenograph.. ‘journalist’ (..?) in question to a face to face online interview – – they refused.
I knew full well that the hatchet job hit-piece was already being written – the agenda was already set and decided – In our email exchanges this reporter has already lied to me – and denied it – twice.

N.B. The song used in this video is one of Barrie’s own – ‘Don’t Think’. by Barrie V with Mel Jones on guitar – Dinosaurs demo – yep that’s Mel Jones – my brother, on guitar – a ‘Dinosaurs’ demo – Vocals Lyrics Melodies Bass and Keyboards by Barrie V (Barrie Jones) Guitar – Mel Jones – Copyright 1982 – 1993 Barrie Jones PRS Tunecode – to follow – ISWC – to follow See also: and See also Barrie’s ridiculing of various and sundry BBC MSM MIPAC blah blah codswallop here:

Great honour for us:


Support us:

N.B. The song I often use on videos, and by way of example of my lifelong history speaking out on what’s ‘right and wrong’ – my dislike of white-supremacism, colonialism, capitalism – the 1%, is this:
Barrie V – Two Worlds © (remastered excerpt) Vocals Lyrics Melodies Bass and Keyboards by Barrie VVeiss, Guitar – Mel Jones – Copyright © 1993 Barrie Jones PRS Tunecode – 7255174F – ISWC – T-011.463.136-5 Copyright ©Barrie Jones 1993

Best China Info – Whimsical thoughts, notions, videos, views.. from a happy life in China