The Problem with Faulty US Intelligence

US Intelligence Malfunction

Document Begins:

Possible Implications of Faulty
US Technical Intelligence in the Damascus
Nerve Agent Attack of August 21, 2013
Richard Lloyd – Former UN Weapons Inspector
Tesla Laboratories Inc. Arlington, VA
Voice: 509-979-3995; e-mail: rlloyd@tesla.net
Theodore A. Postol: Professor of Science, Technology,
and National Security Policy
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Voice: 617 543-7646; e-mail: postol@mit.edu
Washington, DC January 14, 2014
MIT Science, Technology, and
Global Security Working Group


1 – What is the Main Policy Issue?
x The Syrian Improvised Chemical Munitions that Were Used in the August 21,
Nerve Agent Attack in Damascus Have a Range of About 2 Kilometers
x The UN Independent Assessment of the Range of the Chemical Munition Is in
Exact Agreement with Our Findings
x This Indicates That These Munitions Could Not Possibly Have Been Fired at
East Ghouta from the “Heart”, or from the Eastern Edge, of the Syrian
Government Controlled Area Shown in the Intelligence Map Published by the
White House on August 30, 2013.
x This mistaken Intelligence Could Have Led to an Unjustified US Military
Action Based on False Intelligence.
x A Proper Vetting of the Fact That the Munition Was of Such Short Range
Would Have Led to a Completely Different Assessment of the Situation from
the Gathered Data
x Whatever the Reasons for the Egregious Errors in the Intelligence, the Source
of These Errors Needs to Be Explained.
x If the Source of These Errors Is Not Identified, the Procedures that Led to this
Intelligence Failure Will Go Uncorrected, and the Chances of a Future Policy
Disaster Will Grow With Certainty.

— Richard Lloyd
— Theodore Postol
Richard Lloyd – Former UN Weapons Inspector – Tesla Laboratories Inc. Arlington, VA
Voice: 509-979-3995; e-mail: rlloyd@tesla.net
Theodore A. Postol – Professor of Science, Technology, and National Security Policy
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Voice: 617 543-7646; e-mail: postol@mit.edu

2 Claims from US Technical Intelligence that are Inconsistent With Physics-Based Objective Facts
Statement on Syria
Remarks
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Treaty Room
Washington, DC
August 30, 2013
Our intelligence community has carefully reviewed and re-reviewed information regarding this attack, and I will tell you it has
done so more than mindful of the Iraq experience. We will not repeat that moment. Accordingly, we have taken unprecedented steps to
declassify and make facts available to people who can judge for themselves.

We know where the rockets were launched from and at what time. We know where they landed and when. We know rockets came only from regime-controlled areas and went only to opposition-controlled or contested neighborhoods.
And we know, as does the world, that just 90 minutes later all hell broke loose in the social media.

for four days they shelled the neighborhood in order to destroy evidence, bombarding block after block at a rate four times higher than they had over the previous 10 days.

In all of these things that I have listed, in all of these things that we know, all of them, the American intelligence community has high confidence, high confidence. This is common sense. This is evidence. These are facts.

So now that we know what we know, the question we must all be asking is: What will we do?

By the definition of their own mandate, the UN can’t tell us anything that we haven’t shared with you this afternoon or that we
don’t already know. And because of the guaranteed Russian obstructionism of any action through the UN Security Council, the UN
cannot galvanize the world to act as it should.

President Obama will ensure that the United States of America makes our own decisions on our own timelines based on our values
and our interests.

So that is what we know. That’s what the leaders of Congress now know. And that’s what the American people need to know. And
that is at the core of the decisions that must now be made for the security of our country


3
Claims from US Technical Intelligence that are Inconsistent With Physics-Based Objective Facts
Opening Remarks Before the United States Senate Committee on
Foreign Relations
Testimony
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
September 3, 2013
I remember Iraq. Secretary Hagel remembers Iraq. General Dempsey especially remembers Iraq.

that is why our intelligence community has scrubbed and re-scrubbed the evidence. We have declassified unprecedented amounts of
information. And we ask the American people and the rest of the world to judge that information.

We have physical evidence of where the rockets came from and when.

We have a map, physical evidence, showing every geographical point of impact – and that is concrete.

We are certain that none of the opposition has the weapons or capacity to effect a strike of this scale – particularly from the heart of
regime territory.

So my colleagues, we know what happened. For all the lawyers, for all the former prosecutors, for all those who have sat on a jury – I
can tell you that we know these things beyond the reasonable doubt that is the standard by which we send people to jail for the rest
of their lives.

As confidently as we know what happened in Damascus, my friends, on August 21st, we know that Assad would read our stepping
away or our silence as an invitation to use those weapons with impunity.

4

Claims from US Technical Intelligence that are Inconsistent With Physics-Based Objective Facts
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/08/30/government-assessment-syrian-government-s-use-chemical-weapons-august-21
Statement:
Multiple streams of intelligence indicate that the regime executed a rocket and artillery attack against the
Damascus suburbs in the early hours of August 21. Satellite detections corroborate that attacks
from a regime-controlled area struck neighborhoods where the chemical attacks reportedly occurred
– including Kafr Batna, Jawbar, ‘Ayn Tarma, Darayya, and Mu’addamiyah. This includes the
detection of rocket launches from regime controlled territory early in the morning,
approximately 90 minutes before the first report of a chemical attack appeared in social media.
The lack of flight activity or missile launches also leads us to conclude that the regime used
rockets in the attack.
Issue:
Satellite technical intelligence is one of the most reliable technologies available to the US
intelligence community. Satellite measurements provide highly reliable rocket launch point
locations to fractions of a kilometer.

5
White House Map Published on August 30, 2013 Showing Government Controlled Area
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2013-08-30_map_accompanying_usg_assessment_on_syria.pdf

6 White House Map Published on August 30, 2013 Showing Government Controlled Area
~ 5.5 – 6 km
~ 10 km
Ranges from the “Heart” and Extreme Eastern Edge of
Syrian Government Controlled Areas to Zamalka

7
White House Map Published on August 30, 2013 Showing Government Controlled Area
Ring of Maximum Ranges from Where
Chemical Munitions Could Have Been Launched
Siqba
Range-Boundary to
Designated Targets ~ 1.75 km
Range-Boundary to
Designated Targets ~ 2.25 km
us
‘Irbin

8 White House Map Published on August 30, 2013 Showing Government Controlled Area and
Ring of Maximum Ranges from Where Chemical Munitions Could Have Been Launched

9
White House Map Published on August 30, 2013 Showing Government Controlled Area and
Ring of Maximum Ranges from Where Chemical Munitions Could Have Been Launched

10 Important Basic Observation – The Rocket Behaves Like a Balloon
That Is, Its Range Is Dominated By the High Aerodynamic Drag from Its Body-Shape
x The Range Does Not Change Drastically with Significant Changes in the
Body Weight or Due to Uncertainties in the Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient.
x Due to Volume and Fuel Density Constraints, Our Assumption of Rocket
Propellant Carried by the Munition is at the Top End of What is Possible.
This Means that Our Estimated Maximum Range of 2 km for the
Improvised Munition Is Close to its Upper Possible Range!
In Turn, It Means That the US Government’s Interpretation of
the Technical Intelligence It Gathered Prior to and After the
August 21 Attack CANNOT POSSIBLY BE CORRECT

11
Remainder of Talk
x Discusses How the Indigenous Chemical Munition Could Be Manufactured
By Anyone Who Has Access to a Machine Shop With Modest Capabilities
That Is, the Claim Is Incorrect that Only the Syrian Government Could
Manufacture the Munition.
x Shows Why the Range Estimate of Roughly Two Kilometers Hardly Changes
If the Munition Carries a Lighter Payload.

Appendices
1.Source Data on GRAD Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient
2.Source Data on the GRAD Rocket Motor Characteristics
3.Description of Capabilities of Space-Based Sensors Used
to Detect the Rocket Launches in the Damascus Attack

This Means that Our Estimated Maximum Range of 2 km for
the Improvised Munition Is Close to its Upper Possible Range!
In Turn, It Means That the US Government’s Interpretation
of the Technical Intelligence It Gathered Prior to and
After the August 21 Attack

CANNOT POSSIBLY BE CORRECT

SYRIA 1

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *